WHY EVEN READ MY BLOG?

May it please the Court (of Public Opinion). Olivia Mugenga, for the Defense. My Client, Lawyerliv&Co’s daily blog, stands accused of oversaturating the audience. I posit to you that this case is about restoring the lost art of reading. Favoring my client, are the following elements:

1. Dear members of the jury, the amount of tea my client spills on their own self is ginormous, which I suspect will be of great interest to you!
2. My Client provides for a 5 Min Daily Focus in a Distracted Microwave Generation.
3. This is an opportunity to learn about important causes: Rebuilding Africa, The fight against FGM, Women’s Rights, Philanthropy, Global Conflict Resolution…
4. Gender Wars/Battle of the Sexes are explored in a humorous way PLUS solutions on how men & women ought to thrive together.
5. An Insider look at my Client’s Juicy Quest to Love.

Prosecuting Attorney:
Your Honor, a gazillion blogs out there, how could this one possibly stand out?
Defense Counsel: Objection! Question is inflammatory and assumes facts not in evidence. Please rephrase. Actually, may we approach, your honor? *Unintelligible Speech, Difficult to Decipher*
Defense: My Closing Remarks are simple. Dear members of the jury, do you or do you not wish to exit the matrix? In a generation where group think is paramount and critical thinking is on life support, my client provides an opportunity to contemplate important questions of society. Consider this your contribution to restoring order in the jungle. I rest my case.